ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Prediction of Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders: Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model Development and Temporal Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Up to 50% of patients treated with internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) for depression and anxiety disorders do not experience clinically significant symptom reduction. Identifying these patients prior to the initiation of ICBT can support treatment planning. Objective: The aim of this study was to enhance baseline prediction of clinically meaningful improvement in patients treated with ICBT for common psychiatric disorders in routine care, which could ultimately inform treatment planning at intake. Methods: We developed multimodal predictive models integrating clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic data available pretreatment to predict clinically meaningful improvement in a sample of 1790 patients treated with ICBT for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. We applied machine learning algorithms of varying complexity (logistic regression, random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting, support vector machines, soft voting, and stacking ensemble), with nested cross-validation, elastic net variable selection, multiple imputation, and temporal validation in a 20% holdout test set (n=356). The primary performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: All full phenotypic models showed comparable performance (AUCtest 0.732-0.749), with RF achieving the best holdout discrimination (AUCtest 0.749, 95% CI 0.698-0.797). Compared with the benchmark model based on self-reported screening data (AUCtest 0.695, 95% CI 0.637-0.748), RF and both ensemble models incorporating register data showed higher discrimination in paired DeLong tests (P=.04, P=.02, and P=.03, respectively), whereas polygenic scores added no independent predictive value in this cohort and modeling setup (P=.97). Conclusions: These promising results support the feasibility of baseline prognostic prediction of clinically meaningful improvement after ICBT and provide a basis for the prospective validation of model-informed risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.