Evidence mapPaperPMID 42567955Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.

Andrea Villa, Ashley L Eadie, David Synnott, Rebecca Romanò, Max Piffoux, Evelyn Yi Ting Wong, Naomi Scheinerman, Daniel S W Tan, Filippo Guglielmo Maria de Braud, Miriam Koopman and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Andrea Villa *Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ashley L Eadie *Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David SynnottDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaumont RSCI Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7870-467X
Rebecca RomanòDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Max PiffouxCentre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Evelyn Yi Ting WongDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Naomi ScheinermanDepartment of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel S W TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-6786
Filippo Guglielmo Maria de BraudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Miriam KoopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-1978
Jarushka NaidooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beaumont RSCI Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Madhusmita BeheraWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Selen BozkurtWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susan HalabiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-2777
Rodrigo DienstmannOncoclínicas Medicina de Precisão, Oncoclínicas & Co, São Paulo, Brazil.
Loic VerlingueCentre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Arsela PrelajDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. arsela.prelaj@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Ravi B ParikhDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. ravi.bharat.parikh@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology clinical trials are often characterized by slow accrual, high failure rates and limited generalizability, reflecting both biological complexity and operational inefficiencies. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) - enabled by large-scale electronic health record datasets and machine learning methods - offer new opportunities to address these challenges across the clinical trial lifecycle. In this Review, we discuss applications of AI across pre-trial design, trial conduct, and post-trial inference and generalization, highlighting how these tools can improve trial feasibility, support patient engagement and extend the relevance of trial findings. We also address cross-cutting challenges related to equity, data quality and drift, transparency, and regulatory oversight. The most immediate and evidence-supported role of AI in oncology trials lies in augmenting operational workflows under human oversight, particularly in the identification of candidate patients for enrollment, eligibility assessment, data extraction and trial monitoring (including remote patient and/or safety monitoring as well as monitoring of AI model performance and real-time trial data extraction) - applications that are now being implemented at select cancer centres. By contrast, AI applications designed to replace clinical evidence generation, such as synthetic control arms, outcome-prediction simulations and digital twins, remain at earlier stages of development, with limited prospective validation and unresolved methodological and regulatory challenges. Ultimately, we argue that achieving the potential of AI in oncology clinical trials will require rigorous prospective validation, harmonized regulatory standards, and coordination among clinicians, trialists, regulators, industry and patients.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.