Trial reportApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Using a decision support tool to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use after a delayed prescription.
Trial report in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Antibiotic use: psychological factors influencing perceptions and behavior of physicians and patients].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is partly driven by overprescribing antibiotics in primary care. Delayed antibiotic prescriptions, which allow patients to monitor their symptoms before deciding to use antibiotics, are a promising intervention. However, this strategy is undermined when patients initiate antibiotic use immediately. Using a behavioural game measure with behaviour-contingent financial incentives that models delayed prescriptions, we examined whether a decision support leaflet issued by the World Health Organization can, alone or in combination with other evidence-based interventions, reduce inappropriate antibiotic use for viral infections. In a pre-registered online experiment (N = 663 UK adults), participants were randomly assigned to one of five experimental conditions: (i) control condition, (ii) leaflet only, (iii) leaflet with value integration task, (iv) leaflet with active symptom monitoring and (v) leaflet with value integration and active monitoring. Inappropriate antibiotic use was lower in all decision support conditions than in the control condition (p < .001, η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.