ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Brain heart crosstalk after ischemic stroke toward a unified framework for pathophysiology and precision medicine.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute ischemic stroke and cardiac dysfunction engage in a complex bidirectional interplay that critically determines patient outcomes. Despite growing recognition of the brain-heart axis, a comprehensive mechanistic framework integrating traditional and emerging pathways remains lacking. Moreover, existing reviews have predominantly focused on descriptive mechanisms without systematically evaluating the strength of evidence, addressing knowledge gaps, or proposing testable hypotheses for precision medicine. Recent advances: This review systematically delineates the pathophysiology, clinical spectrum, and management of brain-heart crosstalk following acute ischemic stroke. We first establish the core mechanisms: autonomic dysregulation with catecholamine surge, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activation, neuroinflammation and systemic immune suppression, mechanical coupling via mechanosensitive Piezo1 and Piezo2 channels, and the gut brain-heart axis mediated by trimethylamine N oxide. Critically, we identify where evidence is robust versus preliminary, highlighting inconsistencies such as the divergent roles of Piezo1 versus Piezo2 in cardiac pathology and the unresolved causal relationship between trimethylamine N oxide and post stroke outcomes. We then examine the clinical consequences including Takotsubo syndrome, atrial fibrillation, QT prolongation, left ventricular dysfunction, and secondary brain injury, and critically appraise current management strategies such as hemodynamic control, beta blockers, anti-inflammatory agents, and neuromodulation. Key challenges and future directions: Major knowledge gaps persist regarding the temporal dynamics of autonomic dysregulation, the narrow therapeutic window for beta blockade in acute stroke, the lack of stroke specific anti-inflammatory trials, and the underexplored potential of gut microbiota modulation as a therapeutic target. We propose a testable precision medicine paradigm integrating multimodal biomarkers to identify high risk individuals and guide targeted interventions. Conclusion: The brain-heart axis is a pivotal determinant of post stroke prognosis. However, current evidence remains predominantly observational or derived from non-stroke populations. Moving beyond descriptive integration toward mechanism based, hypothesis driven, and personalized strategies will be essential to improve long term outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.