ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Creating cognitive normative data for rural Indian population.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
63 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Population-specific normative data are essential for accurately interpreting cognitive test performance, particularly in low-resource settings characterized by low literacy rates. In India, normative values for the Indian Council of Medical Research-Neurocognitive Tool Box (ICMR-NCTB) among older adults in rural communities are limited. The objectives are to generate education-stratified normative values for ICMR-NCTB cognitive domains and to evaluate their cross-sectional classification ability for identifying early cognitive impairment among high-risk older adults in rural India. Methods: Baseline data were derived from the Strategic Multimodal Intervention in at-risk elderly Indians for prevention of dementia (SMRUTHI) cohort, a large, multi-site community-based study conducted across four rural regions of India. Neuropsychological assessments were administered to adults aged 55 years or older using the ICMR-NCTB battery. Normative centiles were estimated using quantile regression and the Box-Cox power exponential (BCPE) method to account for skewness and kurtosis in the test score distributions and to adjust for site effects. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the ability of individual tests and composite scores to distinguish normal cognition from early cognitive impairment, as defined by the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB). Results: Of 3,917 individuals pre-screened, 3,000 cognitively normal and 175 cognitively impaired participants were included. Education demonstrated moderate associations with performance, whereas the demonstrated of age and gender were minimal. The normative data demonstrate a steady pattern across older age strata, with stable, domain-specific age-related changes rather than an unexpected decline. Literates performed better than their low-literate counterparts. ROC analyses indicated acceptable to good classification performance for several tests, particularly episodic memory measures and the composite z-score (area under the ROC curves up to 0.84). Empirically derived cutoffs approximated the 25th percentile, striking a balance between sensitivity and specificity for screening purposes. Discussion: The large-scale, community-based study generated, age-education-stratified normative data for the ICMR-NCTB among high-risk older adults in rural India. The findings underscore the importance of population-specific, percentile-based normative values for early detection of cognitive impairment in settings with low literacy and high cultural diversity, while highlighting limitations related to ceiling effects in certain measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.