Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568547›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2026

Mechanisms and management strategies for exacerbated bone loss following denosumab discontinuation.

Jiancheng Yang, Ming Yang, Yuhong Zeng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiancheng YangDepartment of Osteoporosis, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Ming YangDepartment of Osteoporosis, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuhong ZengDepartment of Osteoporosis, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab is a first-line therapy for osteoporosis, yet the rebound increase in bone turnover markers, rapid bone loss, and elevated fracture risk following its discontinuation have become major challenges in clinical management. This review systematically summarizes the potential mechanisms underlying exacerbated bone loss after denosumab withdrawal and the corresponding sequential treatment strategies. Current mechanistic studies have focused on several hypotheses, including the accumulation of osteomorphs and osteoclast precursors, imbalance in the RANKL/OPG ratio, uncoupling of bone remodeling, and osteocyte-mediated aberrant microdamage repair, which collectively contribute to the burst activation of bone resorption upon treatment cessation. To address this risk, international consensus recommends proactive sequential antiresorptive therapy for patients discontinuing denosumab. For short-term users (≤2.5 years), sequential administration of a single dose of zoledronic acid or alendronate can effectively preserve bone mineral density. For long-term users (>2.5 years), zoledronic acid should be initiated 6 months after the last dose, accompanied by intensive monitoring based on bone turnover markers and repeated dosing as needed. Additionally, emerging strategies such as early transition to romosozumab or alternating use with bisphosphonates have shown potential. Future studies are required to validate the underlying mechanisms in humans and to optimize sequential treatment regimens through prospective trials, thereby enabling individualized therapy and safe discontinuation.

Indexed as

bone mineral densitybone turnoverdenosumabdiscontinuationfractureosteoporosisreboundsequential therapy

Identifiers

PMID42568547
PMCPMC13447490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.