ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting pneumonia risk in patients with hemorrhagic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a distinct, stable, and interpretable predictive model using machine learning techniques to identify individuals at high risk of pneumonia early after admission. The goal was to provide a potential quantitative reference for implementing preventive interventions in clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective nested case-control design was adopted. A total of 822 patients with hemorrhagic stroke admitted between January 2019 and October 2024 were enrolled. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression to eliminate multicollinearity and identify key predictors. Five machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LRC), gradient boosting classifier (GBC), random forest classifier (RFC), multilayer perceptron classifier (MLPC), and support vector machine classifier (SVC)-were employed to construct predictive models. Hyperparameters were optimized through 10-fold cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was comprehensively evaluated on an independent test set using metrics including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1-score. Finally, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were applied to interpret the optimal model and elucidate the contribution of each feature to the prediction. Results: LASSO regression selected 14 key predictors from 57 initial variables. Among the five models, the logistic regression model achieved the best performance on the test set. SHAP-based interpretability analysis revealed that the most influential factors for pneumonia risk prediction were, in descending order: left lower limb muscle strength, total cholesterol (TC), right lower limb muscle strength, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), white blood cell count (WBC), consciousness status, D-dimer, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and bleeding location. Conclusion: This study successfully developed a logistic regression-based predictive model for pneumonia risk in patients with hemorrhagic stroke. The model demonstrated favorable discrimination and stability. It provides an objective, quantitative basis for early identification of high-risk patients, stratified management, and precise prevention and control, supporting a shift from reactive to proactive complication management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.