Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568591›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Neuroprotective effects of noble gases following acquired brain injury: a narrative review.

Hongru Li, Zeming Xie, Sicen Wan, Gang Chen, Jiahe Wang, Xiang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongru Li *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zeming Xie *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Sicen WanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jiahe WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noble gases were chemically inert elements that have attracted increasing interest because of their potential neuroprotective properties. Among them, xenon had long been used as an inhalational anesthetic, while xenon, argon, and helium had also been investigated for possible neuroprotective effects. This narrative review focused on acquired brain injury, particularly ischemic stroke, post-cardiac arrest hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, and traumatic brain injury. Preclinical studies had suggested that several noble gases might reduce secondary neuronal injury, although the strength and consistency of evidence varied across gases and experimental models. Proposed mechanisms included attenuation of excitotoxicity, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, although these pathways had not been fully clarified for all gases. This review summarizes and compares the available preclinical and early clinical evidence on xenon, argon, and helium in acquired brain injury. Among these gases, xenon currently had the strongest and most consistent evidence base, whereas evidence for argon remained heterogeneous and evidence for helium was limited. Although the preclinical findings were promising, clinical translation remains limited, and further standardized studies were needed to define efficacy, safety, timing of administration, and feasible delivery strategies.

Indexed as

acquired brain injuryargonheliumneuroprotectionnoble gasxenon

Identifiers

PMID42568591
PMCPMC13447450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.