ArticleClinical case reports2026
A Case Report of Short-Coupled Ventricular Fibrillation Unmasked During Post-Infarction Inflammatory Remodeling.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case illustrates the rare clinical emergence of the short-coupled ventricular fibrillation (SC-VF) phenotype during the subacute remodeling phase following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although SC-VF is traditionally characterized as an idiopathic syndrome occurring in structurally normal hearts, we report the case of a 49-year-old male who experienced sudden cardiac arrest 5 days after successful revascularization for an anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite documented coronary patency, the patient manifested an electrical storm of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PMVT) and VF, triggered by ultra-short-coupled premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (coupling interval = 240 ms). The arrhythmia proved refractory to conventional lidocaine therapy. However, prompt recognition of the SC-VF phenotype facilitated the cautious administration of verapamil-notwithstanding a mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 43%)-which successfully suppressed the rhythmic instability. Following the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention, this case suggests that post-AMI inflammatory remodeling is temporally associated with the unmasking of latent electrophysiological vulnerabilities. Ultimately, the detection of an ultra-short coupling interval (< 300 ms) serves as a pivotal clinical marker for transitioning from standard sodium channel blockade to mechanism-driven calcium channel antagonism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.