ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Predicting anti-CCP positivity and early rheumatoid arthritis onset from routine laboratory parameters: a SHAP-explained machine learning pipeline.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate prediction of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is critical for improving patient prognosis; however, existing approaches rely excessively on single autoantibody markers, neglect the systematic predictive value of routine hematological parameters, and lack mechanistic interpretability. In this study, 500 patients attending a rheumatology outpatient clinic were enrolled, and 29 routine laboratory features were collected. Anti-CCP positivity and early RA onset within 12 months were defined as dual binary prediction targets. Five traditional machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, SVM, and KNN) and five deep learning models (MLP, ResNet, Transformer, AE-Classifier, and TCN) were systematically compared using six evaluation metrics: accuracy, AUC-ROC, F1-score, precision, recall, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). A four-dimensional SHAP explainability analysis was subsequently applied to the best-performing deep learning model. Logistic regression achieved the best overall performance (Accuracy = 0.848, AUC = 0.857, F1 = 0.910, MCC = 0.441). Among deep learning models, the Transformer performed relatively well (AUC = 0.812), whereas ResNet and TCN exhibited severe class collapse (MCC ≈ 0). SHAP analysis identified ESR (Mean|SHAP| = 0.097) and CRP (0.090) as the most important positive predictive drivers, and albumin (ALB, 0.062) as the key protective factor, together forming a core biomarker triad for early RA risk prediction. Dependence plots further revealed the synergistic interaction between ESR and CRP, as well as a non-linear protective threshold effect of ALB. Individual waterfall plots confirmed close alignment between model decisions and clinical pathological mechanisms. The proposed machine learning pipeline based on routine laboratory parameters can effectively predict early RA risk, and the SHAP explainability analysis transforms the model "black box" into clinically readable decision rationale, providing evidence-based support for optimizing early screening strategies in rheumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.