ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2026
Postnatal Care Practice and the Facilitating Factors Among Japanese Primary Care Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postnatal care encompasses multiple health and social domains requiring a comprehensive approach. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are well-positioned to provide postnatal care, but research on their practice remains limited. This study aimed to investigate PCPs' practice frequency and attitudes toward postnatal care, and to examine PCP attributes associated with postnatal care provision. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with an online questionnaire targeting certified PCPs via the Japan Primary Care Association. The questionnaire assessed frequency, perceived importance, and educational experience across 13 postnatal care domains. Practice frequency and perceived importance were examined descriptively on a five-point Likert scale, and the association between PCP attributes and postnatal care provision was analyzed by logistic regression. Results: We analyzed 259 responses (response rate: 17.4%). Practice frequency was highest for follow-up of non-pregnancy-related chronic conditions (79%) and maternal health care maintenance (71%), and lowest for intimate partner violence (25%) and postpartum gynecological examination (20%). Mean perceived importance scores exceeded mean practice frequency scores across all postnatal care domains. Intimate partner violence showed the largest practice-attitude discrepancy. Having received education in one domain was positively associated with practice in that domain. Other factors related to practice included female gender, immunization of infants, physicians' experience with raising children or postnatal health problems, and practicing in a rural area. Conclusion: There were variations in practice frequency and discrepancies between practice frequency and attitudes across postnatal care domains among Japanese PCPs. Addressing medical education as a modifiable factor may help reduce these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.