Evidence mapPaperPMID 42568801Full record

SynthesisResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026

Biological clocks and blood clots in space: circadian disruption-induced modulation of thrombosis risk.

Zeinab Ibrahim, Ronan P Murphy, Germaine Cornelissen Guillaume, David Andrew Green, Roopen Arya, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Nandu Goswami

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zeinab IbrahimCenter for Spaceflight and Aviation Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Ronan P MurphyIntegrative Cell & Molecular Physiology Group, School of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Germaine Cornelissen GuillaumeHalberg Chronobiology Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
David Andrew GreenKBR GmbH, Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roopen AryaKing's Thrombosis Centre, Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital Foundation National Health Service Trust, London, UK.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Nandu GoswamiCenter for Spaceflight and Aviation Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-duration space missions expose astronauts to microgravity, radiation, confinement, fluid redistribution, and circadian disruption, which together induce physiological adaptations, including cardiovascular hemodynamics. Emerging evidence suggests that spaceflight may modulate hemostasis and potentially increase thrombotic risk in the head/neck; however, the association of circadian disruption and hemostasis in space, and its ground-based analogs, has yet to be systematically evaluated. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from real-spaceflight missions and ground-based analogs to (i) characterize thrombosis-related and hemostatic adaptations, (ii) evaluate circadian remodeling under altered gravitational conditions, and (iii) identify mechanistic and methodological gaps linking biological timing to coagulation regulation in space. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from January 2016 to January 2026. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies investigating circadian rhythms, clock-gene regulation, autonomic chronobiology, hemostasis, thrombosis, platelet biology, and coagulation pathways, in spaceflight or spaceflight analogs were systematically screened and analyzed. Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria, of which 20 (52.6%) primarily examined hemostasis and thrombosis outcomes and 18 (47.4%) focused on circadian regulation. Thrombosis-related investigations demonstrated dynamic modulation of coagulation cascades, platelet activation pathways, fibrinogen levels, endothelial markers, and complement components across dry immersion, head-down bed rest, animal unloading models, radiation exposure, hypergravity, and real astronaut missions. However, most hemostatic studies relied on end point or milestone-based sampling without circadian-phase resolution. In contrast, circadian-focused studies used dense temporal sampling and revealed phase shifts, altered autonomic rhythmicity, and disruption of molecular clock regulators under simulated and real space conditions, yet rarely assessed direct thrombotic end points. Importantly, no included study simultaneously assessed circadian-phase regulation and hemostatic outcomes, highlighting a critical lack of mechanistic evidence linking biological timing to thrombotic regulation in spaceflight environments. The absence of circadian phase-resolved hemostatic assessment represents a fundamental mechanistic gap. Future integrative chronothrombotic study designs are required to determine whether disrupted biological timing directly contributes to thrombotic vulnerability during spaceflight.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksBlood CoagulationCircadian RhythmSpace FlightThrombosisAnimalsHemostasisHumansRisk FactorsWeightlessnesscircadian rhythmcoagulationendothelial dysfunctionhemostasismicrogravityplatelet activationspaceflightspace medicinethrombosisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID42568801
PMCPMC13448024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.