ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Actual status of visitor and telephone restrictions for Japanese psychiatric inpatients: A retrospective observational study.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To clarify the status of visitor and telephone restrictions and the factors associated with these restrictions among patients hospitalized for the treatment of mental disorders. Methods: This study included 1,998 patients hospitalized for the treatment of mental disorders at the Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University Hospital, and the Department of Psychiatry, Kitasato University East Hospital between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2021. The visitor and telephone restriction ratios of the participants were calculated, and their associations with demographic and clinical data and psychiatric diagnosis were comparatively examined. Results: Of the 1998 participants, 434 (21.7%) experienced visitor restrictions and 631 (31.6%) experienced telephone restrictions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that young age, involuntary admission, seclusion, physical restraint, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and manic episodes of bipolar I disorder were associated with visitor restrictions. Additionally, young age, hospitalization days, involuntary admission, seclusion, physical restraint, and manic episodes of bipolar I disorder were associated with telephone restrictions. Conclusions: The visitor and telephone restriction ratios were 21.7% and 31.6%, respectively. Age, involuntary admission, seclusion, physical restraint, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and manic episodes of bipolar I disorder were associated with visitor restrictions, and age, hospitalization days, involuntary admission, seclusion, physical restraint, and manic episodes of bipolar I disorder were associated with telephone restrictions. Further research is required to clarify the factors related to visitor and telephone restrictions and their impact on patients to minimize their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.