Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568972›Full record

ReviewBMJ public health2026

Community engagement strategies for antimicrobial resistance control and interventions.

Sanjaya Acharya, Thomas J Peto, Abhilasha Karkey, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Bipin Adhikari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjaya AcharyaAcademy for Data Science and Global Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Thomas J PetoMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-9891
Abhilasha KarkeyCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Phaik Yeong CheahMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bipin AdhikariMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-3910

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat spanning biomedical, social and ethical domains. Conventional stewardship and regulatory strategies, often vertical and clinically oriented, frequently overlook community realities and the systemic drivers of antimicrobial use. Focusing on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this review blends insights from the literature and authors' experiential knowledge of working on AMR in LMICs and highlights community engagement as an essential yet underexplored component of AMR control. Community engagement encompasses complementary breadth-based approaches (e.g., awareness-raising activities and population-level communication) and depth-based approaches (e.g., community dialogue, coproduction, shared decision-making and accountability), together forming a 'diagonal approach' to developing locally relevant and sustainable AMR interventions. This approach integrates population-level communication with context-specific partnerships involving communities and other One Health stakeholders. Drawing on evidence from community engagement, ethics, health systems and One Health, we examine how integrated engagement approaches across various sectors can address the social and structural determinants of antimicrobial use while complementing stewardship efforts and health system strengthening. We argue that embedding meaningful community engagement within AMR policies and interventions can support equitable, context-sensitive and sustainable AMR governance and strengthen the long-term effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPublic HealthScoping Review

Identifiers

PMID42568972
PMCPMC13448595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.