ReviewBMJ public health2026
Community engagement strategies for antimicrobial resistance control and interventions.
Review in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community perceptions, trust, and experiences of malaria clinical research and participation in rural Cambodia.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat spanning biomedical, social and ethical domains. Conventional stewardship and regulatory strategies, often vertical and clinically oriented, frequently overlook community realities and the systemic drivers of antimicrobial use. Focusing on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this review blends insights from the literature and authors' experiential knowledge of working on AMR in LMICs and highlights community engagement as an essential yet underexplored component of AMR control. Community engagement encompasses complementary breadth-based approaches (e.g., awareness-raising activities and population-level communication) and depth-based approaches (e.g., community dialogue, coproduction, shared decision-making and accountability), together forming a 'diagonal approach' to developing locally relevant and sustainable AMR interventions. This approach integrates population-level communication with context-specific partnerships involving communities and other One Health stakeholders. Drawing on evidence from community engagement, ethics, health systems and One Health, we examine how integrated engagement approaches across various sectors can address the social and structural determinants of antimicrobial use while complementing stewardship efforts and health system strengthening. We argue that embedding meaningful community engagement within AMR policies and interventions can support equitable, context-sensitive and sustainable AMR governance and strengthen the long-term effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.