ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Operational Factors Associated With National Guideline Adherence to Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Management in the Emergency Department.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines for sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) management recommend emergency departments (EDs) rapidly assess pain and administer pain medication following an individual's arrival. An ED's experience treating SCD along with co-occurring operational factors may affect guideline adherence. We investigated the effect of operational factors on VOC guideline adherence within a large New Jersey health system. Methods: Electronic health record data between January 2022 and September 2025 were analyzed. Outcomes: rate of guideline-concordance, time-to-first and time-to-second pain medication administration. Adherence was defined as first dose ≤30 minutes after triage and second dose Results: There were 7160 ED visits by 1401 patients. 14.2% of encounters were adherent for first pain medication, and 52.6% for second. SCD volume, ED volume, shift, and ESI score were associated with guideline-concordant encounter rates, but not site-level decreased average times. Shift timing was the only exposure significantly associated with mean times to both first and second pain medication administration. Individuals arriving during the evening shift received their first pain medication 15.93 minutes later (95% CI: 2.43 to 29.37) and their second pain medication 10.92 minutes later (95% CI: 4.01 to 17.83) than those arriving during the night shift. Conclusion: Several operational factors were associated with the likelihood of guideline-concordant encounters; whereas, only shift timing influenced mean times to pain medication administration, highlighting a distinction between guideline concordance and overall timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.