ArticleNeuroscience informatics2025
Revealing spatiotemporal neural activation patterns in electrocorticography recordings of human speech production by mutual information.
Article in Neuroscience informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolution of speech communication devices for anarthria: a review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Spatiotemporal mapping of neural activity during continuous speech production has been traditionally approached using correlation coefficient (CC) analysis between cortical signals and speech recordings. A prior study employed this approach using electrocorticography (ECoG) data from participants who underwent invasive intracranial monitoring for epilepsy. However, CC cannot detect nonlinear relationships and is dominated by the correspondence between periods of silence and of non-silence. New Method: We introduce the mutual information (MI) measure, which can capture both linear and nonlinear dependencies. We validated CC and MI on the sub-second spatiotemporal brain activity recorded during continuous speech tasks. To refine the results, we also implemented a novel "masked analysis", which excludes periods of silence, and compared it with the standard (unmasked) analysis. Results: Our findings show that previous results, obtained through more complex statistical methods, can be reproduced using CC with an appropriate threshold cutoff. Moreover, both standard MI and CC are influenced by broad transitions between silence and speech, but masking allows the detection of intrinsic correspondences between the two signals, revealing more localized activity. Comparison with existing methods: Compared to the standard CC, masked MI highlights early prefrontal and premotor activations emerging ∼440 ms before speech onset. It also identifies sharper, anatomically coherent activations in key speech-related areas, demonstrating improved sensitivity to the fine-grained spatiotemporal dynamics of continuous speech production. Conclusion: These findings deepen our understanding of the neural pathways underlying speech and underscore the potential of masked MI for advancing neural decoding in future speech-based braincomputer interface applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.