ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Congenital heart disease in pregnancy and severe maternal morbidity: a distributed data network study.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant people with congenital heart disease (CHD) are a growing patient population in obstetrics, yet evidence on the risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has largely been limited to studies that lack specificity for CHD. We conducted this study to demonstrate the utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and to characterize pregnant patients with CHD and their risk of SMM. Methods: The study included female patients aged 12-55 years who delivered between 2015 and 2026 at three U.S. academic healthcare organizations. We used a distributed data network study design by developing analytical code, executing the code locally at each organization using its electronic health record (EHR) data in a common data model (CDM), then aggregating the results. This analytical approach is rigorous, reproducible, and protects patient confidentiality by not sharing patient-level data. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM was used by each organization, and we used OMOP standard concepts to identify CHD and SMM. We categorized outcomes as SMM, non-transfusion SMM, and cardiac SMM based on the CDC SMM index. We analyzed the incidence of the outcomes and estimated risk ratios (RRs) and Wald 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using contingency tables. Results: The prevalence of CHD in pregnancy was 2.20% among 166,033 deliveries across three healthcare organizations. 19.30% of people with CHD had an acquired heart condition, compared to 2.14% of people without CHD. SMM occurred in 9.43% of deliveries to people with CHD compared to 4.53% among people without CHD (RR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.88, 2.31), and non-transfusion SMM occurred in 6.72% vs 2.55% of deliveries (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.33, 2.98), respectively. Cardiac SMM represented 51.84% of non-transfusion SMM among people with CHD compared to 16.18% among people without CHD. Conclusions: Our distributed data network study using EHR data from three geographically diverse U.S. healthcare organizations found that 1 in 15 people with CHD had non-transfusion SMM compared with 1 in 39 people without CHD. This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and provides novel evidence on maternal outcomes for pregnant patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.