ArticlePeerJ2026
Machine learning and single-cell RNA sequencing identify shared diagnostic genes and mechanistic links between antiphospholipid syndrome and carotid atherosclerosis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent vascular events in large, medium, or small vessels. These events contribute to cardiovascular disease primarily through thrombosis and atherosclerosis (AS). Carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) represents a particularly high-risk manifestation of subclinical AS in patients with APS. However, the shared molecular signatures linking APS and CAS remain unclear. Methods: Bulk transcriptome datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in APS and CAS. Common DEGs were characterized by Gene Ontology (GO)/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses. Candidate hub genes were prioritized by integrating Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), random forest, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and MCODE, followed by diagnostic evaluation in independent datasets. Upstream regulatory networks and immune infiltration were assessed using Results: A total of 4,264 DEGs were identified in APS and 838 DEGs in CAS, including 52 common DEGs (43 upregulated and nine downregulated). These common DEGs were enriched in plasma-membrane and actin-cytoskeleton-related functions, with nominal KEGG signals involving oxytocin, Jak-STAT, and PI3K-Akt pathways. Cross-method prioritization highlighted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.