Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569410›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026

Sustained relief of chronic headache using percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation treatment: 12-month results from a multicenter, prospective clinical study.

Zachary L McCormick, Christopher A Gilmore, Genaro G Gutierrez, Mitchell P Engle, Matthew J Pingree, Jason E Pope, David J DiBenedetto, Narayan R Kissoon, William J Huffman, Nathan D Crosby and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zachary L McCormickDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Christopher A GilmoreCenter for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Genaro G GutierrezPain Specialists of America, Austin, TX, USA.
Mitchell P EngleInstitute of Precision Pain Medicine, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
Matthew J PingreeAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jason E PopeEvolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
David J DiBenedettoMedVadis Research, Waltham, MA, USA.
Narayan R KissoonAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
William J HuffmanSPR, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nathan D CrosbySPR, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joseph W BoggsSPR, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to assess the long-term durability of pain relief among patients with cervicogenic headache (CGH) or occipital neuralgia (ON) following percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment. Background: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) and occipital neuralgia (ON) are challenging headache conditions with significant impact on function and quality of life. The present feasibility study initially reported that percutaneous 60-day PNS can reduce headache, facilitating functional improvements such as improved quality of life and reduced neck disability. This work evaluates the durability of clinical outcomes through 12 months within the study cohort. Methods: Twenty participants with CGH or ON (and without migraine) received bilateral, percutaneous leads stimulating the occipital nerves. Leads were left indwelling for up to 60 days before being withdrawn. During prospectively defined follow-up through 12 months, participants reported on their occipital pain intensity and pain interference, as well as secondary outcomes. Results: Through 12 months, 82% of participants reported sustained, substantial reductions (≥50%) in pain and/or pain interference. Clinically meaningful changes in secondary outcomes, including pain-related neck disability, impact of headache on daily life, and quality of life, were also observed. Results through 3 months on device effectiveness and safety have been previously published. No new device-related adverse events were reported in the follow-up phase of the study among these participants. Conclusions: A majority of participants with CGH or ON had sustained relief from pain and pain interference, resulting improvements in function, and reductions in disability through 12 months following a percutaneous 60-day PNS treatment without any new device-related adverse events reported after the 3-month follow-up. These findings support the feasibility for 60-day PNS in the treatment of refractory pain due to CGH or ON.

Indexed as

60-day PNSCervicogenic headacheHeadacheOccipital nervesOccipital neuralgiaPeripheral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42569410
PMCPMC13449970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.