ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Satisfaction with follow-up consultations among Swiss childhood cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Late effects are frequent among adult childhood cancer survivors (ACCS), making long-term follow-up (LTFU) care essential. This study examined satisfaction and worries among ACCS after their first LTFU visit and explored associated factors. Methods: ACCS (≥18 years) entering LTFU care at two Swiss outpatient clinics, Cantonal Hospital of Baselland and Bern University Hospital, completed questionnaires before and three months after their first visit. Data were collected between 2017 and 2023. Outcomes included satisfaction with patient-centered care and information dissemination, as well as worries, each rated from 1 to 4. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associated factors. Results: A total of 145 ACCS were included in the study. Satisfaction was very high, with mean scores of 3.77 (range = 2.75-4.00) for patient-centered care and 3.58 (range = 1.78-4.00) for information dissemination. Worries were reported at moderate levels (M = 2.02, range = 1.00-3.67). Discussing a higher proportion of wished topics during the visit was associated with greater satisfaction with patient-centered care ( Conclusions: Satisfaction with LTFU visits was generally very high. ACCS with lower mental HRQoL may benefit from additional psychological support to mitigate worries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.