ReviewSSM - population health2026
Does sustainability marketing make people think food is healthier? A systematic review of health halo effects.
Review in SSM - population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Information on sustainability has become increasingly prominent in food environments, shaping how consumers interpret the environmental attributes of food products. This is beginning to attract attention among scholars of the commercial determinants of health as evidence of the effects of sustainability labels and claims on perceptions of healthiness. However, their implications for dietary choices and population health remain fragmented. We report a systematic review examining the relationship between sustainability labels and claims and perceived food healthiness. Methods: We searched Web of Science and PubMed for empirical studies examining the relationship between sustainability-related product cues and perceived food healthiness. A total of 2714 records were screened, and 233 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 25 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence, analysing patterns across study designs, types of sustainability-related cues, and health-related outcomes. Results: Across the included studies, sustainability labels and claims frequently increased perceived product healthiness. These effects varied by the type of health-related outcome considered and were more consistently observed in general health perceptions (i.e., food healthiness) than in evaluations of specific nutritional attributes (i.e., calorie content). They also tended to be stronger when these signals were presented in isolation rather than alongside additional product cues. Conclusion: This review extends the literature on health halo effects to sustainability-related food information and suggests that sustainability labels and claims may influence consumer judgments beyond their intended environmental or ethical purpose. These findings highlight the importance of considering potential spillover effects when designing and regulating sustainability-related information in food environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.