ReviewCureus2026
A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials for Vitiligo Therapies Published Between 2013 and 2023.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitiligo is a depigmentation disorder whose treatment remains a serious challenge. While it is generally accepted that topicals and phototherapy are helpful for generalized symmetric disease, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence for treatment. Our objective was to identify and summarize RCTs for vitiligo from 2013 to 2023. A systematic review registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) was performed per PRISMA guidelines. We searched CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for RCTs using keywords such as 'vitiligo' and/or 'treatment' or 'intervention.' A total of 652 studies underwent full-text review, and 151 studies met the inclusion criteria. We focused our study on RCTs using the vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) as the primary outcome measure, leading to 36 studies. We further narrowed our focus to studies that could be aggregated into the intervention categories: phototherapy and systemic combination therapy (n=10), topical and topical combination therapy (n=15), and systemic monotherapy (n=5). Treated versus control subjects showed statistically improved VASI after the following interventions were added to phototherapy: oral psoralen, oral minipulsed prednisone, implanted afamelanotide, topical ethyl vanillate, topical bimatoprost, and oral vitamins A and E. Effective topical therapies were ruxolitinib, calcipotriol and betamethasone, tacrolimus and mometasone, and microdermabrasion and tacrolimus. None of the systemic monotherapies was superior to their corresponding comparator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.