Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569628›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Implementation of locally processed neuron-specific enolase is associated with improved guideline-concordant neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective before-and-after study.

Christopher D Smith, Saxon Douglass, Nilesh A Devanand, Daniel C Adair, Samantha Nankivell, Megan Freeman, Philip Emerson, Peter Hibbert, Luke Collett, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher D SmithIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Saxon DouglassDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nilesh A DevanandIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Daniel C AdairIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Samantha NankivellSA Pathology, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Megan FreemanSA Pathology, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Philip EmersonIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter HibbertCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke CollettIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Krishnaswamy SundararajanIntensive Care Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), accurate neuroprognostication enables shared decision-making and avoids premature or unnecessarily delayed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Guidelines recommend a multimodal approach requiring at least two independent poor-prognostic criteria, of which neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is currently the primary endorsed serum biomarker. NSE is not consistently used, and guideline adherence remains variable internationally. Objectives: To evaluate whether locally processed NSE improved guideline-concordant neuroprognostication and decision-making timelines after OHCA. Methods: A single-centre retrospective before-and-after study at an Australian quaternary intensive care unit (ICU) compared control (January 2022-July 2024) and intervention (August 2024-March 2026) periods. Sixty-nine comatose adults who underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment on neurological grounds after OHCA were included. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant neuroprognostication (≥2 multimodal poor-prognostic criteria). Secondary outcomes were time to clinical determination of a poor neurological prognosis and prognostic disclosure to the family. Results: Guideline-concordant neuroprognostication increased from 35.9% (14/39) to 63.3% (19/30), an absolute increase of 27.4% ( Conclusions: Implementation of locally processed NSE was associated with a statistically significant increase in guideline-concordant multimodal neuroprognostication. Decision-making timelines were unchanged, consistent with prognostication being shaped by human and system-level factors beyond diagnostic availability. NSE availability was not associated with earlier withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitsNeuron-specific enolaseNeuroprognosticationOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42569628
PMCPMC13450595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.