Evidence mapPaperPMID 42569696Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026

Biofilm-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Infected Wound Reconstruction.

Shiyu Cao, Bingran Qi, Pengfei Di, Jiashu Xie, Shuang Lin, Peng Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiyu CaoDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Bingran QiDepartment of Dermatology, General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
Pengfei DiDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Jiashu XieDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Shuang LinDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Peng ChangDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic-resistant, biofilm-infected wounds are a major clinical challenge because bacterial persistence is embedded within a broader pathological wound ecosystem characterized by chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, vascular dysfunction, impaired extracellular matrix remodeling, and defective tissue regeneration. Conventional antimicrobial strategies may reduce planktonic bacteria but often fail to eradicate mature biofilms or restore the biological conditions required for durable healing. This review critically examines biofilm-responsive nanoplatforms as stage-adaptive, interface-aware, and translationally disciplined therapeutic systems for reprogramming chronic infected wounds toward regenerative repair. Rather than treating these platforms as nanoscale antibiotic carriers, we emphasize their potential to coordinate sequential wound needs: early extracellular polymeric substance disruption, pathogen suppression, and local niche penetration, followed by immune recalibration, redox balance restoration, angiogenic support, and matrix reconstruction. Across metallic, oxide, polymeric, lipid, silica, metal-organic framework, and two-dimensional nanomaterial systems, therapeutic performance is governed by both material composition and integration into wound-facing interfaces such as hydrogels, electrospun dressings, multilayer patches, microneedles, injectable depots, and biofabricated scaffolds. These interfaces determine retention, activation, penetration depth, and biological timing. We further highlight that multifunctionality must be balanced against a "complexity tax": additional responsive elements are clinically justified only when they address defined biological barriers that simpler systems cannot overcome. We conclude that biofilm-responsive wound nanomedicine must move beyond bacterial killing alone toward validated wound-ecosystem regulation, with stronger emphasis on mature biofilm models, polymicrobial infection, human-relevant tissue testing, long-term scar quality, and reproducible manufacturing. This disciplined design approach is essential for translating biofilm-responsive nanoplatforms from laboratory constructs into clinically credible tools for tissue reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsWound HealingWound InfectionAnimalsHumansNanomedicineAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic-resistant infected woundsbiofilm-responsive nanoplatformsstage-adaptive therapytranslational wound nanomedicinewound-state conversion

Identifiers

PMID42569696
PMCPMC13450632

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.