ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
[Semaglutide and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review].
Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are highly prevalent conditions and represent a major public health problem. Objective: To conduct an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of semaglutide on hepatic outcomes in patients with MAFLD/MASH. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing the effect of semaglutide on hepatic outcomes in patients with MAFLD/MASH were included, using histological parameters and/or imaging methods. Results: The analyzed studies suggest a benefit of semaglutide compared with placebo in hepatic outcomes. Regarding the outcome of MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, consistent results were observed among studies that included liver biopsy. However, when evaluating fibrosis improvement without worsening of MASH, the results were heterogeneous. Imaging studies demonstrated a consistent benefit of semaglutide on hepatic steatosis. Nevertheless, no significant changes in liver stiffness were demonstrated. Differences in sample size, follow-up duration, and analyzed populations may explain these discrepancies. Conclusion: The use of semaglutide in patients with MAFLD/MASH was associated with improvements in variables related to hepatic steatosis and, to a lesser extent, with changes in fibrosis markers. These findings should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.