Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569844›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Protein-Based Probiotic Delivery Systems: Structural Basis, Functional Roles, and Food Applications.

Jinghang Zhang, Haifu Jia, Xiyuan Zhang, Xinyi Yang, Wei Zhang, Ling Guo, Qianyu Zhao, Yujun Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinghang ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Haifu JiaKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Xiyuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Xinyi YangKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Wei ZhangKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Ling GuoKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Qianyu ZhaoKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Yujun JiangKey Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2857-2137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have considerable potential in regulating gut microbiota, improving metabolic health, and enhancing host immunity. However, during food processing, storage, and gastrointestinal digestion, they are susceptible to stresses including heat, acidity, oxygen exposure, moisture changes, and digestive fluids, leading to reduced viable cell counts and impaired functionality. Developing delivery systems that integrate protective capacity, processing adaptability, and food compatibility is, therefore, an important direction for advancing probiotic applications in foods. Food proteins possess favorable nutritional properties, biocompatibility, and structural design flexibility. They can undergo self-assembly driven by non-covalent interactions and further co-assemble with second components such as polysaccharides and polyphenols, thereby forming diverse delivery materials. Starting from protein assembly behavior, this review summarizes representative formation pathways of protein-based probiotic delivery materials and clarifies how different pathways lead to delivery structures, such as nanoparticles, nanogels, hydrogels, nanofibrils, microcapsule shells, nanocoatings, and nanofibers. On this basis, the three major functional roles of protein materials in probiotic delivery systems are summarized, namely, encapsulation, scaffold construction, and interfacial regulation. Their adaptability to different food matrices in food applications and the safety issues requiring attention are further discussed. This review aims to clarify the structural evolution of protein-based probiotic delivery systems from the origin of material formation, providing a reference for their structure-guided design, processing-pathway optimization, and expanded food applications.

Indexed as

ProbioticsProteinsHumansProteinsfood matricesfood proteinsformation pathwaysprobiotic delivery systemsprotein self‐assembly

Identifiers

PMID42569844
PMCPMC13452073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.