ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Moral emotion processing in euthymic bipolar disorder: insights from network analysis.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBipolar disorder (BD) is associated with facial emotion recognition (FER) deficits. Among these, impairments in recognizing moral emotions may be especially relevant to social dysfunction, but their relationship with brain structure remains poorly defined.
methodsIn this cross-sectional case-control study, 48 euthymic adults with BD (BD-I, n = 20; BD-II, n = 28) and 45 sex- and age-matched healthy controls completed a computerized FER task and 3T T1-weighted MRI scan. FER efficiency (accuracy/response time) for facial moral (anger and disgust) emotion expressions and gray-matter volume (GMV) from 9 bilateral a priori fronto-limbic/salience regions were compared between groups. Group-specific psychometric networks (regularized partial-correlation, i.e. Gaussian graphical models; LASSO/EBIC) integrating FER and GMV nodes were estimated and compared using the Network Comparison Test.
resultsRelative to BD-II and controls, BD-I showed lower FER efficiency, with poorer decoding of moral but not neutral facial expressions. Network structure differed between BD-II and controls, whereas global network strength was comparable across all pairwise group comparisons. Exploratory centrality analyses suggested a more frontally weighted configuration in BD-I, with the superior frontal gyrus among the more central nodes.
conclusionIn BD-I, persistently reduced ability to decode morally salient facial cues co-occurred with subtype-related differences in fronto-limbic structural covariance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.