ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Impact of surgical start time on clinical outcomes in urologic surgery: a single-center study of major oncologic surgeries and adrenalectomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of surgical start time on perioperative outcomes remains controversial, and evidence in urologic oncology is limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between surgical start time and clinical outcomes across major urologic procedures.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 2627 patients who underwent major urologic surgeries at a single institution from 2010 to 2025. Patients were categorized into morning (8:00-12:00) and afternoon (after 12:00) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and overall survival, were compared. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the association between surgical start time and operative duration.
resultsBefore PSM, the morning group included patients with higher perioperative risk, and operative time, estimated blood loss, and overall survival were significantly worse than in the afternoon group. After PSM, 954 patients with balanced baseline characteristics were included in each group. In the matched cohort, estimated blood loss and overall survival were comparable between groups, whereas operative time remained longer in the morning group. Perioperative complication rates were similar between groups. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a consistent pattern across procedures, surgeon experience, and surgical approaches, with operative time shorter in the afternoon group.
conclusionsSurgical start time was associated with operative duration, with morning procedures taking longer than those in the afternoon. However, surgical start time was not associated with perioperative complications or overall survival. These findings suggest surgical start time may influence operative efficiency but has limited impact on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.