SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026
Interobserver and intraobserver variability of fetal and maternal Doppler measurements: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the variability and reproducibility of umbilical artery (UA), fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) and uterine artery (UtA) Doppler ultrasound measurements in pregnancy.
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) was conducted from inception to 17 June 2024. Studies were included if they reported intra- or interobserver variability of UA, MCA or UtA Doppler ultrasound measurements in singleton or multiple pregnancies, using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), concordance correlation coefficient, Cohen's kappa or limits of agreement. Data extraction was performed using standardized data-extraction forms. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity, and variability estimates were pooled using Fisher's Z-transformation. Reproducibility was categorized according to the True Reproducibility of Ultrasound Techniques (TRUST) criteria.
resultsIn total, 2426 records were screened. Of these, 26 studies including 2457 patients met the inclusion criteria; eight studies described UA Doppler, 11 described MCA Doppler and 11 described UtA Doppler results; two of the studies described cerebroplacental ratio results. The pooled intraobserver ICC for UA pulsatility index (PI) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-0.94) and the pooled interobserver ICC was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79). For MCA-PI, these values were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-0.90), respectively, and for mean UtA-PI they were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89), respectively. Findings across studies suggested generally poor-to-moderate reproducibility according to the strict TRUST criteria.
conclusionsOur results emphasize that there is room for improvement regarding the reproducibility of Doppler ultrasound in routine obstetric practice. By standardizing ultrasound measurement protocols, advancing technologies such as artificial-intelligence-supported measurement applications and training programs, as well as obtaining multiple measurements per session and performing quality audits when outliers are detected, the field could move towards more accurate and reliable fetal assessments. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.