ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Nutritional intake and growth in very low birth weight infants: a comparison of standardized versus parent-led complementary feeding.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Introduction of Solid Foods in Preterm Infants: Effects on Growth, Atopy and Neurodevelopment
Weaning of Preterm Infants During the First Year of Life: Impact on Anthropometry, Body Composition, Atopy and Neurodevelopmental Outcome
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complementary feeding (CF) period is critical for ensuring adequate nutrient intake to support optimal growth in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. This analysis compares nutritional intake and growth across two CF strategies: a standardized, protocol-driven approach and a non-standardized, parent-led approach. Both cohorts included infants with a birth weight <1500 g. The standardized group followed an age-dependent CF protocol utilizing commercial baby jars, whereas the non-standardized cohort practiced parent-led feeding without dietary restrictions. Nutritional intake was assessed using 3-day dietary records. Infants in the non-standardized study had significantly higher intakes of protein, fat, arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid, while the standardized cohort showed higher iron and zinc intakes from 6 months corrected age onwards. Despite nutritional differences, growth was similar between cohorts. This comparison demonstrates notable differences in nutrient intake between CF approaches and may guide individualized strategies to support the nutritional needs of VLBW infants. Clinical trial registration: Randomized, standardized study: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01809548. Non-standardized, prospective study: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02936219.
Identifiers
42570946What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.