Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571100›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal for philosophy of science2026

The importance of spatial structure in biology.

Margarida Hermida, James Ladyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal for philosophy of science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margarida HermidaSchool of Philosophy, Religion, and History of Science, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0259-109X
James LadymanDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Bristol, BS6 6JL UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living things are highly complex and organised. This is often taken as an objection to reductionism and a point in favour of organicist views, which argue for the central role of the organism in all biological explanations. This paper argues that biological organisation often either is, or depends on, spatial structure, together with interactions among parts of the system understood in physical terms. We take spatial structure to include position, configuration, shape, directionality, and orientation of objects in space. Important features of the spatial structure of living systems include physical boundaries, such as membranes; cellular structure, which includes physical objects spatially arranged in certain ways; directionality and orientation with respect to internal and environmental signals; location, both of organisms in their environments and of components within the organism; and shape, including the shapes of organisms and their components at atomic, mesoscopic, and larger scales. The importance of spatial structure for explanations of the functioning of biological systems corroborates criticisms of genetic and molecular reductionism, but is compatible with physical reduction - the explanation of biological phenomena in physical terms - and part-whole reduction - the explanation of systems in terms of their parts, spatial structure, and interactions with each other and their environment.

Indexed as

BiologyExplanationOrganicismPhysicsReductionismSpatial structure

Identifiers

PMID42571100
PMCPMC13451363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.