ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Dietary fiber concentration modulates the efficacy of phytogenic and antimicrobial rumen modifiers on ruminal fermentation and methane emissions in cattle.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of dietary fiber level and rumen modulators on feeding behavior, methane emissions, and ruminal fermentation parameters in cattle. A single 4 × 4 Latin square design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used, involving four ruminally cannulated cattle evaluated over four experimental periods. The treatments combined two dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations (12% and 50% of dry matter) with two feed additive strategies: monensin plus virginiamycin (VM) or a phytogenic additive (LM+). Diets containing 12% NDF represented forage-free conditions, whereas diets containing 50% NDF represented conventional fiber-based feeding systems. Dry matter intake, rumination time, ruminal pH, and liquid passage rate were greater in animals fed 50% NDF diets (P < 0.05). Methane emissions were substantially higher in 50% NDF diets, averaging 153.1 versus 46.9 g/day, and 12.8 versus 8.8 g/kg DMI for 50% and 12% NDF diets, respectively. Within the 50% NDF diets, LM+ reduced methane emissions by 26% compared with VM (130.0 vs. 176.3 g/day; P < 0.05). Within the 12% NDF diets, LM+ increased total short-chain fatty acid concentrations by 34% compared with VM (95.0 vs. 70.9 mM) and increased butyrate concentration (20.2 vs. 11.9 mM), whereas VM reduced ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration (12.4 vs. 16.9 mM;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.