Evidence mapPaperPMID 42571356Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026

GSH-responsive self-assembled nanoplatform synergistically enhances cuproptosis through metabolic reprogramming and oxidative stress amplification.

Bo Huang, Weijin Zhang, Yunjie Wang, Xian Luo, Wenda Wu, Rong Shen, Xiangquan Liu, Zhibo Zhang, Yi Gao, Yingying Wu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bo HuangCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Weijin ZhangCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Yunjie WangCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Xian LuoCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Wenda WuCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Rong ShenCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Xiangquan LiuSchool of Public Health and Medical Technology, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, Fujian, 361023, PR China.
Zhibo ZhangCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Yi GaoCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Yingying WuCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Fangwei ZengCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Yuan HuangHubei Key Laboratory for Precision Synthesis of Small Molecule Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Synthesis and Application of Organic Functional Molecules, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, PR China.
Jianyun YuSchool of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, 316022, PR China.
Suxiao WangHubei Key Laboratory for Precision Synthesis of Small Molecule Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Synthesis and Application of Organic Functional Molecules, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, PR China.
Ting WuCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Shengyu WangCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.
Shuitu FengThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University(Haicang Campus), Xiamen Cancer Hospital, Xiamen, 361000, PR China.
Fanghong LuoCancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuproptosis, an emerging copper-dependent regulated cell death pathway, demonstrates significant potential for overcoming therapeutic resistance in oncology. However, its clinical translation remains constrained by the poor bioavailability of copper ionophores and intrinsic resistance mechanisms in tumor cells. Here, we developed a tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoparticle platform (PEMA) co-loading an MPC1 (mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1) overexpression plasmid and the copper ionophore Elesclomol to establish a synergistic "metabolic reprogramming-oxidative stress amplification" strategy. The PEMA nanoparticle design incorporated disulfide bonds to deplete intracellular glutathione (GSH), while Elesclomol-mediated copper transport induced mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. In vitro, PEMA achieved >99% tumor cell eradication in ACHN renal carcinoma models, accompanied by characteristic DLAT oligomerization, FDX1 downregulation, and disruption of mitochondrial ultrastructure. In vivo, PEMA treatment induced substantial tumor regression in xenograft models without detectable systemic toxicity. This study establishes a novel therapeutic paradigm that integrates metabolic targeting with oxidative stress potentiation to overcome therapeutic resistance in solid tumors.

Indexed as

Cancer therapyCuproptosisGSH-ResponsiveMetabolic reprogrammingNanoplatform

Identifiers

PMID42571356
PMCPMC13452149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.