ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Whole genome sequencing in cerebral palsy: a UK paediatric pilot study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prior international studies indicate that 9-36% of people with cerebral palsy (CP) have a monogenic condition. However, the utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a diagnostic tool for United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) patients has not been evaluated. Methods: This prospective pilot study recruited 86 individuals with CP from specialist clinics in Bedford, Cambridge, Colchester, Newcastle, and Luton NHS Foundation Trusts. Gene-agnostic trio WGS was performed using AI-based variant prioritisation, with subsequent application of a CP gene list. Candidate diagnostic pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants were reviewed at multidisciplinary meetings and confirmed in an NHS Genomic Laboratory Hub prior to issuing a clinical report. The use of human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms was evaluated to estimate probability of a diagnostic variant using a supervised linear discriminant analysis (PCA + LDA) model. Findings: 86/157 (54.7%) individuals approached consented to the study. Variants meeting P/LP diagnostic criteria were identified in 11/86 cases (12.8%). 8/86 participants (9.3%) carried variants strongly suggestive of disease causation. Variants of uncertain significance were identified in 27/86 cases (31.4%). In all cases with P/LP variants, findings informed patient prognosis, specialist care, clinical management, and familial recurrence risk. Machine learning approaches were used to segregate the probability of diagnosis for participants based on HPO terms. Interpretation: WGS is clinically useful for diagnosis and management of genetic conditions associated with CP in the UK. Validation of these findings in a larger cohort is warranted. Funding: Rosetrees Charitable Trust, Isaac Newton Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, and the Wellcome Trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.