Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571386›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Rebalancing innovation, affordability, and access for orphan drugs in the European Union.

Hilde Stevens, Georges Siotis, Micael Castanheira, Mathias Dewatripont, Sanae Akodad, Sam Daems, Alain Fischer, Michel Goldman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hilde StevensInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Georges SiotisInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Micael CastanheiraInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Mathias DewatripontInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Sanae AkodadInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Sam DaemsInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Alain FischerAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Unité d'Immunologie-Hématologie Pédiatrique, Institut Imagine, Inserm UMR 1163, Collège de France Paris, France.
Michel GoldmanInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP135, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orphan drug policy in the European Union faces a double price-and-innovation gap: a small fraction of rare diseases receive important resources while the overwhelming majority are under- or un-researched, leaving most rare disease patients facing high unmet medical needs. The European Commission's reform proposals, notably the Pharma Package and the European Biotech Act, seek to rebalance incentives by adjusting market exclusivity. We argue that, while these reforms move in the right direction, they are insufficient to foster meaningful innovation while safeguarding affordability, and that a broader, more structural approach is needed. We show how proposals from the Draghi Report could complement the reforms through an EU-level HTA Coordination Office, a US-style EU ARPA-H, and expanded regulatory sandboxing. We then propose two additional instruments: public-private Special Purpose Vehicles to de-risk high-need innovation, and EU-level joint procurement to strengthen affordability and create predictable demand. Ultimately, only a coherent, well-calibrated framework can align industrial policy with the EU's ambition of leaving no rare-disease patient behind.

Indexed as

AccessAffordabilityDraghi ReportDrug pricingEU Biotech ActEU Pharma Package reformInnovation incentivesMarket exclusivityOrphan medicinal products (OMPs)PolicyRare diseasesRegulation

Identifiers

PMID42571386
PMCPMC13452220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.