ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Rebalancing innovation, affordability, and access for orphan drugs in the European Union.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orphan drug policy in the European Union faces a double price-and-innovation gap: a small fraction of rare diseases receive important resources while the overwhelming majority are under- or un-researched, leaving most rare disease patients facing high unmet medical needs. The European Commission's reform proposals, notably the Pharma Package and the European Biotech Act, seek to rebalance incentives by adjusting market exclusivity. We argue that, while these reforms move in the right direction, they are insufficient to foster meaningful innovation while safeguarding affordability, and that a broader, more structural approach is needed. We show how proposals from the Draghi Report could complement the reforms through an EU-level HTA Coordination Office, a US-style EU ARPA-H, and expanded regulatory sandboxing. We then propose two additional instruments: public-private Special Purpose Vehicles to de-risk high-need innovation, and EU-level joint procurement to strengthen affordability and create predictable demand. Ultimately, only a coherent, well-calibrated framework can align industrial policy with the EU's ambition of leaving no rare-disease patient behind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.