ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2026
Characterising Hepatitis D Virus in the UK From 2011 to 2021.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
68 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection in the UK. HDV screening is recommended among all individuals with HBV, with coinfection associated with increased disease progression. Using data on HDV testing, shared by 11 laboratories in the UK who reported undertaking HDV testing, and national testing data for HBV we established a cohort of individuals tested for HDV, investigating testing pathways, describing characteristics and outcomes of those HDV-RNA positive to inform targeted interventions for testing, diagnosis and linkage to care. Demographic information, clinical assessments, treatment and recent laboratory results from NHS trusts, and through linkage to national healthcare datasets was collected for HDV-RNA positive individuals. Between 2011 and 2021, 42% of individuals newly diagnosed with HBV in England were linked to an HDV test. Anti-HDV positivity was 5.0%, 55.8% were HDV-RNA tested and 45.7% were ever HDV-RNA positive. HDV-RNA positivity in the absence of an anti-HDV result was 6.4%. Among individuals who were HDV-RNA positive, 94.3% were non-UK born, with 24 different primary languages reported, 49% had evidence of treatment, and 48% had evidence of cirrhosis. 10% had died of which 58.4% died of liver disease. In conclusion, our findings indicate that HDV testing in HBV positive individuals in the UK is sub-optimal against testing guidelines, including RNA testing among those who are anti-HDV positive. Considerable work is needed to improve the patient care pathway, to ensure patients are appropriately diagnosed, linked and retained in care, with adequate access to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.