ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Patient-Reported and Technology-Assisted Monitoring in Orthotic Management of Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthotic treatment for adolescents diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis is long-term and often associated with challenges related to treatment adherence. Traditional patient monitoring strategies include clinical visits combined with patient discussions, clinical examination reports, and the use of standard questionnaires. Sensor-assisted monitoring is explored to improve treatment outcomes, with technology influencing different aspects of the health care system. Objective: The scoping review aimed to map evidence based on 3 research questions (RQs), namely user experience and perception, monitoring tools, and technology-assisted approaches, including smart orthoses with sensors, during orthotic treatment for an adolescent patient (aged 10 to 17.11 y) diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus as 2 complementary search components. The primary search targeted studies on smart orthoses, also called braces, and scoliosis, while the secondary search focused on user experiences with orthotic treatment to capture all 3 RQs. PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and checklist supported searching, analyzing, and reporting the results systematically. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for screening. All articles published up to May 2024 were included. Moreover, 2 independent reviewers screened 2088 articles in 2 stages of screening. Data coding was conducted using the 3 RQs by data extraction and its synthesis. Results: A total of 88 articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence from user experience studies highlighted discomfort, psychosocial burden, and demand for real-time feedback. Monitoring relied primarily on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as questionnaires and logbooks. Culturally adapting to patients' diverse global needs helps capture richer and more candid user perspectives. Sensor-based systems used temperature, force, or pressure, electromyography, and motion sensors to track orthosis wear time, pressure distribution, activity, and posture. Two overarching monitoring themes emerged: subjective (patient-reported or user experience) and objective (technology-assisted or sensor-based) monitoring. Integrated approaches synthesize both. Conclusions: Subjective clinical tools and objective technologies help monitor orthosis wear of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Co-design of a user-centered scoliosis management system for adolescents that integrates PROMs with measured sensor data could provide a multidimensional view of orthosis adherence along with psychosocial and clinical effectiveness. Future research will focus on user-centered care, with real-time integrated monitoring, to provide clinically meaningful feedback that motivates adolescents to achieve their treatment goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.