ArticleBrain topography2026
Template-Based Analysis of Age-Dependent Cortical Eigenmodes and Scalp EEG Forward Transfer in Infancy.
Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infancy poses a spatial-coordinate challenge for developmental EEG: cortical geometry, head geometry, and EEG forward propagation change rapidly, so a cortical coordinate system that is meaningful at one age may not be directly comparable at another. We addressed this question in a template-based computational analysis using age-specific infant anatomical templates distributed through MNE-Python. Specifically, we computed cortical Laplace-Beltrami (LB) eigenmodes (cortical harmonics), EEG forward models, and forward-projected eigenmode dictionaries. We asked which eigenmode orders are preferentially expressed at the scalp and whether independently computed age-specific eigenmode coordinates remain stable for cross-age comparison. Forward-projected scalp gain was concentrated in lower eigenmode orders across infancy, indicating a stable coarse-to-fine transfer profile. However, neighboring-age LB bases were only locally comparable by nominal mode index. Same-index modes showed local reordering and mode-index drift, and the same cortical pattern produced coefficient leakage into nearby modes when re-expressed in a neighboring-age basis. These template-level coordinate differences affected simulated downstream analyses: neighboring-age dictionaries were not fully substitutable in low-dimensional sensor space, and a fixed adult-derived basis was suboptimal for recovering same-index coordinates, with larger penalties in early- to mid-infancy. Sequential Procrustes tracking improved same-index consistency, supporting local alignment as a practical step toward age-aware coordinates. Because all quantitative summaries are derived from population-average templates and simulations, they should be interpreted as mechanistic evidence about coordinate-system effects rather than direct estimates of empirical EEG error. These results motivate age-parameterized or explicitly tracked cortical harmonic coordinates for longitudinal developmental EEG and related lifespan analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573644What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.