Evidence mapPaperPMID 42573704Full record

ReviewFolia microbiologica2026

Toward microbiota-friendly design and evaluation of antimicrobial peptides: a mini-review.

Aseel Alrashdan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aseel AlrashdanDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Ma'an College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Ma'an, Jordan. aseel.alrashdan@bau.edu.jo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7757-641X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria driven by the prolonged use and misuse of conventional antibiotics poses a severe threat to global healthcare systems. To combat this risk, considerable research efforts have focused on the discovery of new antibacterial agents. Over the last decade, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have emerged as a highly promising alternative therapy due to their broad-spectrum activity and low propensity for inducing resistance. While numerous therapeutic AMPs have been introduced in the literature and examined for safety and antimicrobial efficacy, their impact on the human microbiota has remained relatively underexplored. Owing to the structural similarities between pathogenic and beneficial bacteria, some of these peptides may adversely affect commensal bacteria, especially at higher doses or following certain routes of administration. Given the importance of preserving ecological homeostasis, this review emphasizes the integration of microbiota safety evaluations at all stages of AMP design and development. It proposes a structured framework for microbiota-inclusive assessment and strategies for the design and delivery of microbiota-friendly variants. This work offers a comprehensive perspective that has received limited systematic attention, providing valuable insights for future research in microbiology and pharmacology.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial peptidesMicrobiome dysbiosisSelective toxicityTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID42573704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.