ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2026
Anomalies of coronary artery origin at invasive angiography: a prospective study of prevalence, catheter utilisation, access strategy and procedural implications.
Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnomalies of coronary artery origin are uncommon congenital variants that may pose a challenge to selective engagement at invasive coronary angiography (CAG). Although their prevalence and anatomical spectrum are well described, prospective data on the diagnostic and guide catheter utilisation to engage each anomaly subtype, procedural implications and on the access strategy adopted in current radial-first practice, remain limited.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 1,850 consecutive adults undergoing invasive CAG, with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anomalies of origin were defined by the modified Angelini classification; intrinsic anomalies and anomalies of termination were excluded. Baseline, angiographic, procedural data - including diagnostic and guide catheter use by subtype; and access strategy were compared between anomaly and non-anomaly groups.
resultsAn anomaly of origin was identified in 85 of 1,850 patients (4.59%; 95% CI 3.71-5.63%); under a restricted definition that excluded two anatomical variants not consistently classified as anomalies in earlier invasive-angiography series, prevalence was 1.30% (95% CI 0.83-1.92%). The commonest anomaly was ectopic (high or anterior) right coronary artery (RCA) origin from the right coronary cusp (n = 47; 55.3%), followed by separate ostia of left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) arteries (n = 14; 16.5%) and anomalous LCx from the right coronary cusp or RCA (n = 14; 16.5%). PCI was performed in 52 of 85 anomaly patients (61.2%). Radial access was attempted in 67 patients: 53 (79.1%) completed radially, 14 (20.9%) required crossover to femoral; and 18 were attempted femorally. Anomaly patients required more diagnostic catheters per case (2.20 vs. 1.23), with the greatest burden in crossover cases (3.14 vs. 1.17 catheters); more access crossover (16.5% vs. 5.0%) and more guide catheter changes (44.2% vs. 6.5%; all p < 0.001),. No significant difference in major procedural complications was observed (4.7% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.43); however the study was not powered for rare procedural events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.