Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573859›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2026

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Esophageal Manometry: A Narrative Review.

Ernesto Robalino Gonzaga, Juliana J Madej, Nitin Ahuja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ernesto Robalino GonzagaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Drive Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Ernesto.Gonzaga@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-0302
Juliana J MadejIdaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, 1401 E Central Drive, Meridian, ID, 83642, USA.
Nitin AhujaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Drive Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHigh-resolution manometry (HRM), the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, remains constrained by inter-rater variability, limited access to expert esophagologists, and inadequate training infrastructure. Many gastroenterology fellowship programs provide insufficient motility training, and dedicated expert centers remain geographically concentrated. Emerging Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to automate diagnosis, and augment clinician interpretive capacity and democratizing expert-level motility assessment. RECENT

findingsTwenty-two studies encompassing over 5,000 patients were synthesized across three overlapping developmental phases: early machine learning for feature extraction and classification; deep learning deployed toward automated pattern recognition and motility classification and emerging multimodal and large language model-based frameworks augmenting clinical interpretation and decision-making, with diagnostic accuracies ranging from 71 to 97%. AI integration of multimodal manometric data may reveal pressure signatures imperceptible to human visual inspection, pointing toward phenotypes beyond the Chicago Classification. No study has yet demonstrated improved patient outcomes. AI's role in motility training remains largely unexplored. The AI-clinician partnership represents the most promising trajectory for esophageal manometry interpretation in coming years. AI-augmented interpretation has the potential to eliminate the two-tier diagnostic gap between academic and community practice, to accelerate trainee competency through scalable AI-supervised case libraries, and to uncover physiologic phenotypes beyond human interpretation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEsophageal Motility DisordersManometryHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceChicago classificationDeep learningEsophageal motility disordersHigh resolution manometryMedical education

Identifiers

PMID42573859
PMCPMC13457500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.