ArticlePloS one2026
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and T-DNA insertion characterisation of Didymella tanaceti and Stagonosporopsis tanaceti for infection visualisation in pyrethrum.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) has been widely used in filamentous fungi for gene functional studies and for the introduction of fluorescent markers to investigate infection biology. In pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium), the foliar pathogens Didymella tanaceti and Stagonosporopsis tanaceti cause significant yield losses. However, the infection biology of D. tanaceti remains poorly understood. In this study, ATMT was used to generate fluorescently labelled strains of D. tanaceti and S. tanaceti expressing mNeonGreen and tdTomato, respectively. Transformants were characterised for fluorescence stability, morphology, growth, and pathogenicity. Whole-genome sequencing revealed predominantly single-copy T-DNA insertions, with occasional partial insertions and small genomic rearrangements. Despite variation in fluorescence intensity among D. tanaceti transformants, stable expression of fluorescent proteins was confirmed in both species. Detached leaf assays demonstrated that transformed strains exhibited infection patterns comparable to their respective wild types. In D. tanaceti, germination occurred by 24 hours after inoculation (HAI), followed by hyphal growth and direct epidermal penetration by 72 HAI, leading to mesophyll colonisation. No major differences in infection timing or colonisation patterns were observed between wild type and transformed strains. In S. tanaceti, infection dynamics were consistent with previous descriptions, supporting the suitability of transformed strains for in planta studies. Fluorescently labelled strains of D. tanaceti and S. tanaceti are valuable tools for investigating infection biology and provide the first visual insights into early infection processes of D. tanaceti in pyrethrum. These findings lay the foundation for future studies incorporating quantitative approaches to better understand pathogen dynamics and interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.