ReviewScience progress
Early intervention in cerebral palsy 1.0-3.0: From passive approaches to precision, context-responsive care.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common lifelong physical disability, with substantial global health and socioeconomic burden. Advances in early diagnosis now enable identification in infancy, enabling a critical window for intervention during periods of heightened neuroplasticity. This narrative review synthesises the evolution of early intervention from historical passive, late, and low-dose approaches to contemporary models emphasising early, child-active, task-specific, and contextually embedded care. Early randomised trials demonstrated benefits of active interventions compared with passive care. In contrast, more recent large pragmatic trials show attenuated overall between-group differences, with effects emerging primarily in subgroups defined by age, severity, and context. Evidence certainty is low to moderate, with the most consistent improvements observed in upper limb function in unilateral CP. Collectively, findings indicate that early intervention is effective, but not uniformly so, and that outcomes depend on the interaction between the individual, intervention, and environment. Early diagnostic and intervention pathways also provide earlier certainty regarding neurodevelopmental trajectory and enable timely identification of infants with treatable genetic conditions. The field is transitioning toward a precision medicine early intervention model focused on optimising who, when, how much, and where to intervene, reflecting a shift toward a precision early intervention model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.