ArticleBMJ open2026
Implementation of lifestyle recommendations in the Dutch medical specialists' guidelines: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe recently showed that 65% of medical specialists' guidelines in the context of chronic disease management in the Netherlands contain recommendations on lifestyle. However, it remains unclear how these recommendations are perceived and implemented in clinical practice.
objectivesTo analyse (1) the level of implementation of these recommendations and (2) the knowledge, attitudes and needs to further facilitate the implementation of lifestyle recommendations in chronic disease management within specialist care from both patient and healthcare professional perspectives.
designMixed-methods cross-sectional study using two surveys.
settingHospital care in the Netherlands.
participantsMedical specialists affiliated with the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists (n=193) and patients who had visited a medical specialist within the previous 6 months, recruited via the Dutch Patient Federation (n=1057). EXPOSURE: Lifestyle recommendations embedded in clinical practice guidelines for chronic disease management.
main outcome measuresThe level of implementation is assessed by the self-reported frequency of lifestyle discussions and familiarity with lifestyle recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.
resultsPatients and medical specialists report different levels of implementation. While 72% of medical specialists reported discussing lifestyle topics during consultations, only 37% of patients recalled such discussions. Guideline familiarity among medical specialists was significantly associated with applying lifestyle advice in clinical practice (Fisher's exact test, p=0.02). Both groups expressed positive attitudes toward addressing lifestyle as part of medical specialist care consultations. Although medical specialists considered the lifestyle recommendations applicable, they identified key factors for successful implementation, including the framing of recommendations, patient motivation and capacity to make lifestyle changes and the organisational and societal contexts in which lifestyle recommendations are delivered.
conclusionsAlthough both medical specialists and patients recognise the importance of addressing lifestyle in healthcare, implementation in clinical practice can still be improved. Strengthening implementation requires institutions to allocate adequate resources to support these consultations, including protected time, targeted training and clearly defined referral pathways. Broader societal and political commitment, ensuring that prevention becomes a priority and shared responsibility across the healthcare ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.