ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2026
The MILEPOST Framework for Integrating mHealth Into Community-Driven Interventions: Lessons Learned From a Human-Centered Design Approach in Rural Uganda.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Participatory design approaches to develop global health interventions have gained traction in recent years. However, while broad frameworks for the application of design approaches exist, literature outlining concrete experiences of and guidance for navigating specific design challenges remains limited. This article proposes a design framework based on our own experiences when applying human-centered design principles to bolster sustainable hypertension medication financing in rural Uganda. In our case study, we embedded an mHealth platform within a community-led health intervention aiming to fund blood pressure medication through a shared financial pooling system. Over the course of this project and in close collaboration with intervention end-users, we developed a design framework that outlines challenges, decision-making processes, and design solutions. We iteratively refined the framework between November 2021 and April 2023 over two phases of extensive formative research and one phase of structured qualitative data collection, consisting of 55 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions with clients with hypertension, health care providers, and key intervention stakeholders. The resulting MILEPOST framework consists of 7 domains to consider amid mHealth intervention co-development: medical (e.g., health challenge scope and management); interpersonal (e.g., communication, decision-making, and trust within and across communities); logistical (e.g., current processes and sustainable implementation pathways); ethical (e.g., research and implementation ethics); political (e.g., stakeholder buy-in and long-term support); scientific (e.g., rigorous and feasible approaches for data collection, management, and analysis); and technical (e.g., mHealth component development, refinement, and implementation). We define each domain, provide examples of design challenges and derived solutions as they emerged in our work, and outline starting points for operationalizing each domain in other contexts or studies. We discuss how MILEPOST can provide guidance to researchers and implementors by contributing specific and actionable insights for participatory health intervention design efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.