ArticleScientific reports2026
An exploratory survey of barriers and enablers of AI adoption in rural and urban dental practices in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Administrative tasks substantially limit the time available for direct patient care in dentistry. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can reduce administrative workload and improve practice efficiency, however its integration into routine dental practice remains limited. Existing research often focuses on specific AI applications or surveying digitally proficient practitioners, leaving practices with lower levels of digitalization underrepresented. This exploratory study establishes a baseline assessment of digitalization and AI readiness in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany. German dental practices with varying degrees of digital maturity were included to assess existing digital infrastructure, current and intended AI use, and perceived barriers to adoption. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among all dental practice owners in the German federal state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. The exploratory survey assessed digital infrastructure, AI use, and perceived barriers. The data was analysed descriptively. A total of 163 dental practice owners participated, including a substantial proportion from rural regions (55%). Most practices reported exclusively digital patient records and appointment management, while the use of advanced digital tools varied. A minority had already implemented AI applications, which included support for administrative and diagnostic tasks, documentation, and radiographic evaluation. The most frequent reported barriers to AI adoption were perceived additional costs, concerns about increased workload, and limited familiarity with AI applications. AI adoption in dental practices in a low-density region remains limited, with practitioners favouring tools that reduce administrative workload. While digital infrastructure is increasingly available, barriers such as financial risk, implementation effort, and limited familiarity persist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.