ArticleCancer medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Fusion of Whole-Slide Images and RNA Sequencing Identifies Survival-Relevant Glioblastoma Clusters.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is profoundly heterogeneous, and single-modality analyses often miss prognostically relevant structure. We introduce a transparent, end-to-end workflow that fuses available whole-slide histology and RNA-seq to discover clinically meaningful glioblastoma subgroups using an unsupervised learning model after feature extraction. Haematoxylin-eosin slides are tiled, tissue-screened and stain-normalised; tiles are embedded with a pretrained ResNet-50 to yield 2048-dimensional features, averaged per patient and compressed to 30-D by an autoencoder. In parallel, RNA-seq (~48 k genes) undergoes low-variance filtering and normalisation, then a second autoencoder produces a 30-D transcriptomic embedding. The two 30-D representations are concatenated into a 60-D fused vector, robustly scaled and refined with PCA (≈98% variance retained). Across K-means, Gaussian mixture models and Agglomerative clustering (k = 2-20), Agglomerative k = 2 was decisively best (mean silhouette ≈0.53), yielding clusters of 150 and 8 patients (survival subset 147 and 8). Survival separation was substantial (median 454 vs. 138 days; log-rank p = 0.0096). In Cox models, the poorer-prognosis cluster showed increased risk (HR ≈ 2.70), which remained significant after age adjustment (HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.04-4.46; age per year HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). Attribution and consensus analyses yielded compact, interpretable gene sets (22 shared; 8 per cluster), including markers associated with NOTCH/γ-secretase and oxidative phosphorylation. These findings nominate biologically plausible hypotheses for future validation rather than immediate treatment-selection rules. Overall, this study demonstrates that auditable late fusion of histology and transcriptomics, built from routine data, can identify survival-associated glioblastoma subgroups and provides a hypothesis-generating framework for prospective, harmonised, multi-centre validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.