Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42576602›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

Machine learning-based prediction of intraoperative blood transfusion in major surgery: exploiting clinical variables and systemic inflammatory indices.

Laura Verzellesi, Lucia Merolle, Marco Bertolini, Valeria Trojani, Davide Schiroli, Andrea Nitrosi, Erminia Di Bartolomeo, Margherita Genitoni, Mauro Iori, Roberto Baricchi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura VerzellesiMedical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-381X
Lucia MerolleTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-4272
Marco BertoliniMedical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-1022
Valeria TrojaniMedical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-2436
Davide SchiroliTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7639-0015
Andrea NitrosiMedical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4271-3677
Erminia Di BartolomeoTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6001-5843
Margherita GenitoniTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-5970-5423
Mauro IoriMedical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-3352
Roberto BaricchiTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-0666
Chiara MarracciniTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-498X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative blood transfusion is common in major surgery. Predicting transfusion risk may improve perioperative management, optimize blood use, and enhance surgical planning. Machine Learning (ML) offers promising tools for individualized risk prediction.

aimTo develop and validate an ML model predicting intraoperative transfusion risk in major surgery using clinical variables and inflammatory indices. MATERIAL AND

methods1858 adult patients who underwent major surgical procedures at AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia between September 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The dataset was splitted into training (60%), internal validation (18%) and internal test (22%) sets. The primary outcome was the intraoperative red blood cell transfusion. Thirty-three candidate variables (29 clinical and laboratory parameters and 4 calculated indices) were evaluated. Highly correlated variables were excluded and key predictors were identified using CatBoost. Predictors distributions were compared by transfusion status and oncological diagnosis. Model performance was assessed by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and F1-score. SHAP graph were used to interpret feature contributions.

resultsThe CatBoost model demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC 0.88 training, 0.80 test). and a high NPV (0.89 training, 0.87 test), reliably identifyinglow-risk patients. Key predictors included type of surgery, preoperative haemoglobin, age, BMI, MCV RDW, PT and inflammatory indices such as MLR, PLR, NLR.

conclusionsThis ML-driven model accurately predicts intraoperative transfusion risk and identifies clinical and laboratory predictors, supporting perioperative management and more efficient resource allocation.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionErythrocyte TransfusionIntraoperative CareMachine LearningAdultAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesCatBoost modelinflammatory ratiosintraoperative transfusionMachine learningmajor surgerymonocyte-to lymphocyte rationeutrophil-to lymphocyte ratiooncological surgerypatient blood managementplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID42576602
PMCPMC13463459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.