ArticleJMA journal2026
Social Isolation and Health Outcomes in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Social isolation is an important social determinant of health, but its relationship with health-related outcomes remains incompletely understood. This study examined whether structural social isolation is associated with subjective health, symptom burden, chronic disease diagnoses, and healthcare-seeking behaviors in a nationwide Japanese population. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using data from the 2024 Japan coronavirus disease 2019 and Society Internet Survey, including adults aged 18-79 years. Social isolation was assessed using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6. Primary outcomes were poor self-rated health and high symptom burden, defined by the Somatic Symptom Scale-8. Secondary outcomes included self-reported chronic diseases and healthcare-seeking behaviors. Results: Among 25,014 participants (mean age: 50.0 years; 49.9% men), 59.3% were classified as socially isolated. Social isolation was associated with higher odds of poor self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.81) and high symptom burden (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.38). In contrast, social isolation was not associated with a higher prevalence of most chronic diseases. Socially isolated individuals were also less likely to have a regular doctor or receive preventive services. Conclusions: Structural social isolation was associated with poorer subjective health and greater symptom burden but not with a higher prevalence of diagnosed chronic diseases. These findings suggest that reliance on diagnosis-based indicators alone may underestimate the health needs of socially isolated individuals, even in healthcare systems with broad accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.