Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026
Prompt engineering a large language model with evidence-based persuasive features to improve confidence in mental health professionals: a pilot randomized experiment.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression carries a heavy global burden, yet treatment gaps persist largely because individuals lack confidence in mental health professionals. Psychoeducation can shift these beliefs, but scaling persuasive messages is difficult. Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable solution, though the specific text-based features that make LLM-generated psychoeducation persuasive remain unidentified. This study identified these features and tested their integration into an LLM prompt to shift confidence in mental health professionals. Methods: In Phase 1, 168 participants rated text pairs contrasting high versus low levels of four candidate features. In Phase 2, 40 participants were randomized to read psychoeducational passages generated by either a prompt incorporating the retained features ( Results: Source credibility, argument quality, and processing fluency significantly boosted both perceived credibility and persuasiveness (all Conclusion: Strategically prompt-engineered LLM outputs incorporating empirically selected persuasive features significantly improve confidence in mental health professionals. This pilot study provides a preliminary evidence-based framework that may inform scalable, LLM-powered public mental health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.