Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577172›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026

Prompt engineering a large language model with evidence-based persuasive features to improve confidence in mental health professionals: a pilot randomized experiment.

Ang Li, Shi-Ting Yao, Bi-Xian Chen, Xin-Yu Li, Sai-Ya Guo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ang LiDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Shi-Ting YaoDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Bi-Xian ChenDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Xin-Yu LiDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Sai-Ya GuoSchool of Foreign Languages, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression carries a heavy global burden, yet treatment gaps persist largely because individuals lack confidence in mental health professionals. Psychoeducation can shift these beliefs, but scaling persuasive messages is difficult. Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable solution, though the specific text-based features that make LLM-generated psychoeducation persuasive remain unidentified. This study identified these features and tested their integration into an LLM prompt to shift confidence in mental health professionals. Methods: In Phase 1, 168 participants rated text pairs contrasting high versus low levels of four candidate features. In Phase 2, 40 participants were randomized to read psychoeducational passages generated by either a prompt incorporating the retained features ( Results: Source credibility, argument quality, and processing fluency significantly boosted both perceived credibility and persuasiveness (all Conclusion: Strategically prompt-engineered LLM outputs incorporating empirically selected persuasive features significantly improve confidence in mental health professionals. This pilot study provides a preliminary evidence-based framework that may inform scalable, LLM-powered public mental health interventions.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelLarge Language ModelsPersuasive CommunicationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsYoung Adultconfidence in mental health professionalsdepression help-seeking attitudelarge language modelprompt engineeringpsychoeducation

Identifiers

PMID42577172
PMCPMC13453785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.